1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
simplydalektable
sillykikuri

tumblr added another secret feature. if you make a post and just type "gullible", it turns it into a different message. tell me which one you got!

gothdoggirl

gullible!!

gothdoggirl

this is so fucked up how could you do this to me op

korbensdeliveryservice

no no you just have to do the word by itself without any punctuation!

gothdoggirl

gullible

gothdoggirl

NOT ONCE BUT TWICE I AM BETRAYED IM LIKE IF CEASER WAS A LESBIAN

simplydalektable
yimra:
“bigwordsandsharpedges:
“Theres a novel by Poul Anderson called The High Crusade, which has an alien spacecraft land in rural England in 1345 during the Hundred Year’s War. The local baron has been raising an army to help King Edward against...
bigwordsandsharpedges

Theres a novel by Poul Anderson called The High Crusade, which has an alien spacecraft land in rural England in 1345 during the Hundred Year’s War. The local baron has been raising an army to help King Edward against the French, and immediately assumes this must be some kind of enemy trick.

In a way, he’s correct: the aliens are scouts for a brutal and repressive interstellar empire, which has dominated numerous planets through their devastating technology.

Unfortunately, this reliance on advanced weapons means they’ve completely forgotten all forms of melee combat and Sir Roger of Tourneville leads his militia to defeat the aliens easily.

They spare a single enemy, forcing him to fly the ship at spearpoint. They intend to raid behind enemy lines, capture the king of France to end the war, and then go onward to reclaim the Holy Land using the same tactic.

In an attempt to outwit the knights, the alien pilot actually travels to the nearest Imperial planet, where he expects the occupying military forces to save him.

I won’t spoil the details, but the knights accept this as a challenge and declare the launch of the “high crusade”.

image
image
image
yimra

That last picture is so stupidly badass I might tattoo that next to my dick cause it ain’t getting any better after that

simplydalektable
thesituation

“your rent should be a third of your income” well wouldn’t that be nice. wouldn’t it. lower the rent pussy

moniquill

Casual observation from someone old enough to remember: in the year 2000 financial advice was that rent should be no more than 1/4 of your income.

vergess

Until the mid 80s, the advice was that if you must rent instead of owning, then that 20% of your monthly income (oh yes, only 20%) should include all your utilities too.

After all, rent costs more than a mortgage, so it should offer more too.

The housing market is a fucking travesty.

homoqueerjewhobbit

Hmm what happened in the mid eighties....

image
commodorecliche

image
cannabiscomrade
guerrillatech

image
aniseandspearmint

  • They didn't want to sit through demeaning and bigoted religious services just for a place to sleep. (Church run food banks do this a lot too btw).
  • They were late and the shelter wouldn't let them in and voided the rest of their allowed stay bc they didn't call and tell the shelter they couldn't make it in before closing.
  • One of the other people at the shelter got violent/threatened violence and the shelter refused to do anything about it.
  • One of the SHELTER EMPLOYEES/VOLUNTEERS got violent/threatened violence and the shelter refused to do anything about it.
  • The shelter refuses to disclose if allergens are in the food they're providing saying, "This is all you're getting, be glad for this much and thank god!"
  • Shelter refused to believe person is homeless saying, "You are FAR too clean and nicely dressed!"
skeleslime-phantom
captaincrais

A series of tweets by Twitter user @Bitterstaff (John Bickerstaff) from May 19, 2023. The first tweet links a Deadline.com article with the headline "Disney to remove dozens of series from Disney+ and Hulu" while Bickerstaff comments, "They gave us six months. Not even. This business has become absolutely cruel." His next tweet says, "Before you say tax write-off: these shows have already been released and so can't be a tax write-off. And in the case of Willow, they own the property outright. The only conclusion is that this is to get out of paying residuals. During a strike." His third tweet says, "And look, eternal streaming libraries are not sustainable. We're all going to have to adjust to that at some point. But to spend [REDACTED] on a show and then disappear it six months later is just bad business."ALT

on the announcement that Disney+ is removing a plethora of shows and films from its service, please read these tweets from Willow writer John Bickerstaff. this is not a tax writeoff like Batgirl, because these projects have already been released. this is a move designed to cut off financial support in the form of residuals, and break the spirit of the strike. here is the deadline article that lists the films/shows that will be removed.

as always, donate to the entertainment community fund, vocally support the WGA online and irl, or join a picket in a major US city if you can. let them know they can't keep getting away with things like this.

parsnipt
inneskeeper

kill the shift manager in your brain

inneskeeper

you are not wasting time you are vibing. you are not being unproductive you are literally chilling. make a grill cheese with cheddar cheese and slather a piece of the bread with some honey and maybe you'll relax

love-of-the-sxn

what if someone doesnt like to chill and vibe

inneskeeper

what do you gain by asking this

the-seelie-court-official

this reminded me of some good words said by interesting creatures

screenshot of a post from the-seelie-court-official which reads: if you argue with positive posts like. idk, grow up  yeah i have more and nuanced thoughts on this, but generally. idk. not everything is about you. if you see a positive post and it makes you angry, just stay silent. don't look for reasons to be angry and Definitely don't lash out or share your negativity with strangers???  Few things will get you blocked faster than being a spiteful killjoy. Let the love in or at least let it pass you by without angrily tearing it to shreds in front of the person trying to articulate it. yes, even if they articulated it in a way you didn't appreciate. you can just ignore the post. damn  followed by peer-reviewed tags that say: "saw a cute bird today! there is joy in the world." "well there is no joy in my life ever!" like in the reblog. not even in tags. okay? (thumbs up emoji) good for you. maybe you go look at a cute bird and come back to me when you're done. and if you got nothing nice to say dont say it.ALT